Compasiosn Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Compasiosn - Essay ExampleRuthless style of ruling could be an competent means through which a person in strength remains in power. However, there are other stronger means to keep the same power even without creating fear among the people. Ensuring that one maintains strong allies in leadership finish ensure that power remains oriented towards the same person all over time. On the other hand, fear instigates and builds up opposition over time, making the situation even worse with time. In fact, gaining the peoples favor can adequately account for power. This is due to creation and development of trust among the involved parties.Machiavellis purpose in the text is one-sided. This is due to the fact that the text tho highlights the need for a prince to only mind his own concerns in relation to retaining power to himself, as opposed to working for and with the people to gain power. A egoistic aspect relating to power and authority is noted in the text. The audience bound to go by the provisions of this text are of dictatorial personality. In other words, the texts credibility cannot hold in a democratic society that seeks to uphold justice, compassion, rights, and freedoms of the people. Machiavellis argument is logical, but unethical to some limit relative to the tone used to present the argument.Aung San Suu Kyi argues that fear to lose power instigates corruption. This text is essentially positioned in the contemporary trends of gaining power and authority. Parties in power go to higher extents in ensuring that they remain in power, and corruption is just but of the realized practices in this line. The thought of losing power serves as the source of myriad evils in leadership. This is due to the fact that leadership roles are accompanied by power and authority. Once power is gained, those in power often get reluctant in giving it up once their term is done.The change of scenario from a party with power to one without power corrupts the minds of many peo ple,